Archive for March, 2005

Top Ten Movie Car Chases

Monday, March 28th, 2005
  1. Brewster McCloud
    An obscure title about a boy who lives in the Astrodome and wants to be able to fly. The chase involves a modified Roadrunner and a z-28 Camaro and an AMC Gremlin.
  2. The Blues Brothers
    Hundreds of police cars and a shopping mall gave their lives to make this chase happen.
  3. The Transporter
    An action film about a driver for hire, some really solid car chase action found in this film.
  4. Gone in 60 Seconds
    A remake of a classic, not to be missed.
  5. The Bourne Identity
    A mini cooper speeding through the back alleys of a European city, hard to beat.
  6. The Italian Job
    Mini coopers speeding through Los Angeles.
  7. Two-Lane Blacktop
    A 55 Chevy and a GTO Judge locked in a long distance race for pinks.
  8. American Graffiti
    Cruisin’ the boulevard in small town America on a Friday night.
  9. XXX
    A 1967 GTO speeding through Prauge, a motor cross assault on a South American drug smugglers hideout, Vin Diesel, what more could one want.
  10. Akira
    It may be animated, but this film contains an excellent high speed motorcycle chase through the streets of Japan.

Additional Note (10/17/05): Great comments, this page gets a lot of input, don’t forget to add you choices for the top movies so that everyone can find car movies that they may not have heard about before.

Additional Note (10/21/05): A unique website that I discoverd that contains a listing of cars found in movies. The Internet Movie Car Database. For example I searched for 1966 Chevelle and found:
The One

Catch Me if You Can and

Link Exchange

Tuesday, March 15th, 2005

Have a Hot Rod site that you would like to link to the Hot Rod Homepage, send me and email and we can work out a link exchange.

Worlds Fastest Fairmont Wagon

Sunday, March 13th, 2005

Take a look at the video

10 second quarter mile times are the holy grail for a street driven car. Most "street" driven cars that can turn in a 10 second time slip are on the ragged edge of street usable. It is the rare case of a well sorted out drive train and suspension combo that produces a 10 second grocery getter. Throw a 10 second drive train under the skin of a pedestrian station wagon and you have the ultimate sleeper.  This Fairmont wagon put together by John Dodson of Lewisville Texas is one such car and a perfect example of what can be achieved with Chevrolet’s LS1 engine when it is built and tuned correctly.










In order to get the car running this fast took considerable time on the dyno with a lot of careful tuning, but the efforts paid off. John drove this car all the way from Lewisville Texas to St. Louis Missouri to race and drove it home afterwards. A car this fast that can be driven that distance and maintain over 20 miles per gallon is near impossible without the use of fuel injection and careful tuning. The wagon is equipped with 3.55 rear gears and has a power glide transmission. Be looking for more information on tuning the LS1 motor in the future as seeing this car has made me decide to pull the engine in my 1964 Malibu and replace it with the LS1.

Feel free to send me e-mail. Geoff Chandler

CHP Photo Shoot

Friday, March 11th, 2005

I spent friday down at the Chevy High Performance Photo Studio and watched John Nelson shoot a 69 camaro for the cover of an upcoming issue. I snapped some photos that I have uploaded to the gallery. Beautiful car, almost looked like one of the renderings down by Kris Horton.

Get Hosted on HRHP

Tuesday, March 8th, 2005

Would you like to have you very own website for your project hosted on the hotrodhomepage.com? I am currently working on a system for doing just that. I will be able to offer a simple ready made template for those with little to no web experiance or a more professional level hosting option for those more comfortable with web design. Rates are very reasonable depending on your needs.

If you are interested send me and e-mail.

Interview with Steve From Hell

Tuesday, March 8th, 2005

A while back I had an oppourtunity to sit down with Steve McClenon the owner of Hotrods to Hell in Burbank, California. I spent a couple of hours chatting with him about his CenterDrive suspension systems. Finally I have found the time to put it down on paper and post it to the website. Enjoy.

Steve McClenon's 1938 Chevy

HRHP: Why Truckarm?

STEVE:
In 1993 I had built a 38 Chevy Coupe for myself, with a very stout big block putting down around 575HP. I wanted this car to handle. The front was easy, mustang II with Chevy intermediate disk brakes. The rear suspension was a different story, 4 link was out of the question, the leaf springs were equally unacceptable, this car had to handle.

I was left with no readily available options. Having long been a fan of Grand National Stock Car racing (Winston Cup) I knew of Truckarm. I started researching the subject; I found the IROC cars also used it, as well as Busch (road course and oval). I soon discovered that there was no information available on the setup, and the Winston Cup chassis builders wouldn’t part with any information, most hung the phone up on me for asking. I gathered up what parts I thought that I would need then started figuring and drawing. I could see that this “simple�? suspension actually involved much more then meets the eye.

I continued to drive my leaf spring car as I researched, but a near death experience at 135 mph on the freeway changed that. The car took a bad hop off a bump and jerked over 3 lanes, I couldn’t lift all at once or the car would barrel roll so I had to squeeze out of the throttle slowly and drive out of trouble. I was able to collect the car inches from the center divider, still going about 90mph. I brought the car back into the fast lane and slowed down to normal freeway speeds. The next day I took the car to work, cleared a space and began to install Truckarm on the car. I looked at the process as a matter of self-preservation, and I had to start somewhere.

Soon the inaugural test drive, just pulling out of the driveway I could feel the difference. The car no longer creaked and groaned from chassis flex. I headed for my personal drag strip, the I-5 North onramp at Fletcher Drive. A long slightly uphill strait, with longitudinal expansion bumps at the top. With leaf springs the coupe would always get sideways. In first or second it wasn’t that big of a deal, but in third around 6000-6500rpm it would start hazing the rear tires and get sideways. This time I was able to flat foot it all the way onto the freeway. I could never do that before Truckarm no matter what line I took on the ramp. I was able to come up onto the freeway in fourth gear and the car just floated over the expansion bumps. The only distraction was the sheet metal blowing around on the car.

That moment was an epiphany for me. I knew that this deal worked, I knew why the cup boys had been using it for all these years, because it actually works. I knew that mistakes had been made, but the improvement to my 38 was nothing less then a total transformation.

This all happened over 11 years ago. We started building custom kits for our customers‚ car. Tri-Five Chevys, El Caminos, Chevelles, Novas, Camaros. Each time our customers were never less then ecstatic, as each car was transformed. As the years progressed we continued to develop and refine the system as each chassis has its own unique requirements. The next step was to develop kits that could be installed by the end user. The first kit was worked out for tri-fives, and 37-54 Chevy passenger cars, then Chevelles and it just kept on going.

HRHP: What came before Truckarm?

STEVE:
For all around live axle suspension Truckarm is the only viable option. A bold statement, I realize, but let us look at the requirements of a live axle rear suspension. Multi-tasking is a word that comes to mind.

Here is my list of priorities:

  1. Transmission of power to the ground
  2. Locate the rear axle in the car
  3. Isolate the chassis from surface irregularities (bumps)

Leaf springs are the cheapest and least effective way to get these three things done. Leaf Spring suspension was great for horse drawn wheeled vehicles when they only had to work as a spring.

The model A with transverse leafs used a wishbone in the rear for fore, aft, and rotational location, and power transmission. The leaf springs only had to do that job of a spring. On the model A the rear leaf only had to suspend that chassis and locate the axle laterally as the torque tube still provided rotational location and shared in the fore and aft location and power transmission

The parallel leaf soon appeared. At first a torque tube still provided rotational location and shared in the fore and aft location and power transmission, while the leaf springs did lateral location and suspension duties. The accountants at GM must have taken some engineering courses as the torque tube was eliminated. Now the leaf springs had to do everything. Suspend the car, transmit power, and locate the rear-end in the chassis. (Lateral, fore and aft, rotational, and transmit power to the chassis) Although this situation is far from desirable, it is cheap. Enter axle tramp (wheel hop) bump and roll steer, pinion wrap up, side sway, and as horsepower increased chassis twisting and sideways launches.

In 1958 Chevy came out with a 3-link setup to address the shortcomings of leaf springs. 2 lower and 1 upper link a short panhard and coil springs. One of the worst bump steering rear suspensions ever devised. The short links as they traveled through their arc would steer the ass end all over the place. The half-length panhard off on two planes added to the problem as its short length causes the rear-end to move laterally as the car moves up and down.

In 1964 Chevy introduced the triangulated 4-link on A-bodies. Gone was the panhard as it was replaced with triangulated upper links for rear-end lateral location. This setup was still plagued with the problem of short links traveling through sever arcs steering the rear-end in bump and roll. Many people will attempt to overcome this by increasing the spring rate of the rear springs to reduce suspension travel and use urethane bushings to control lateral movement. The result is an over sprung car that rides like a buckboard, and a rear suspension that binds.

Another shortcoming of 3-link, 4-link, and leaf spring suspension is that the car is being pushed around from the outer extremities of the chassis. Remember the wheels are not driving your car, its being driven by the suspension pickup points. What this does is creates a yaw intolerance that makes the vehicle more prone to spinout. The GM engineers address this problem by creating under steer in the A and F body lines on both the front and rear of the cars.

I could keep going, but I believe that the point has been made.

HRHP:
What is the History of Truckarm?

STEVE:
The main reason that GM put this rear suspension on their pickup trucks (hence the name Truckarm) was to satisfy a NASCAR requirement for factory rear suspensions. Equipping the trucks with Truckarm suspension made it legal for Jr. Johnson, and his crew chief, GM engineer, Ray Fox to use the setup on their 63 Impala for Daytona 1963.

As it appeared on the trucks it was awful. A half length panhard, above axle centerline, off on 2 planes, shocks at such an oblique angle as to be totally ineffective with the only real dampening coming from stiction in the rubber bushings on the ends of the shocks as the shocks themselves barely compressed. The arm angles and pickup points were also less then optimal. An afterthought, these trucks gave Truckarm a bad name. The trucks were over sprung, under damped, would not hook up, and had panhard induced bump steer that would actually make them do the hula.

The ill performance of the trucks aside, Truckarm use in NASCAR by Jr. Johnson got attention and it did not take long for the competition to follow suit. If it was not for engine failures Jr. Johnson would have been undefeated on the super speedways with Truckarm.

HRHP:
Why use it on my Hot Rod?

STEVE:
Truckarm is very stable and forgiving over high-speed bumpy surfaces. The long arms at a true instant center with the full-length panhard bar stay neutral throughout their range of motion. There is no bump or roll induced steering of the rear axle. The car is being propelled from the center of mass, which makes it very stable, and highly yaw tolerant. When the rear of the car steps out the propulsion points are at chassis centerline making the car very controllable. (The ultimate drifting setup) Also when you are on the throttle, torque reaction from the rear-end housing creates a lifting dynamic through the arms that tries to lift the car from the center of gravity. This lifting is what plants the rear tires so hard while at the same time keep the springs free to absorb surface irregularities. This is why forward bite is so incredible, but the ride quality remains so plush. A rear sway bar is not needed with a Truckarm system, as you are able to add roll rate with the throttle.

Shop Beater
Testing before and after on acceleration runs have shown dramatic improvement in both trap speed and e.t.

With our screw jack system the car can be adjusted in seconds with a hand wrench.

They go like they are on a string, no wheel hop or twisting.

Under braking the rear brakes become much more effective, controlling the car from the center of mass. The torque reaction of the rear-end under breaking pulls the weight of the car down on the springs and in turn on the tires. The chassis also remains much flatter (less dive) and allows for some serious late braking. In test we have seen before and after improvements to braking by as much as 80ft with the same brakes.

What this is all getting at is that our American iron from the past can outperform anything coming off the assembly lines from Europe, Japan, or the US.

Nothing brings a smile to my face faster then watching some poor soul in his high priced import (sport car) spin out while trying to follow my 1966 Chevelle into a high speed corner on Angeles crest hwy.

HRHP:
I would like to thank Steve for taking the time to sit down with me and talk about his products and company. I hope that I will be able to spend some time talking with other vendors in the Hot Rod Industry and add them to the site.

New c6 Z06

Monday, March 7th, 2005

Came across this shot of the first c6 Z06 corvette. Looks quite impressive.
the new z06

The c10 (1969 - 1972)

Sunday, March 6th, 2005

c10 pickup truck
I went out to the Pomona Swap Meet this morning as I am looking for a 1969 - 1972 Chevy C10 SWB pickup. I spent about 2 hours looking at every truck I could find out there and I walked away with a single conclusion. There is absolutely no consistency in the pricing on these trucks. I saw trucks that I would consider of comparable quality with prices differing by as much as $10,000. I keep feeling tempted to buy a fixer-upper, but then I realize that I already have one car in the garage that does not run and the last thing I need is another one. It is always best to spend a little extra money and buy exactly what you want, or as close as you can get, because costs spiral out of control fast when you jump into a project.

C-Clip Ends vs. Ford Style Ends

Friday, March 4th, 2005


This picture attempts to show the differance between a c-clip axle retention system and a Ford style bolt in axle retenton system. The inset image in red is the end of the c-clip axle and that little nub on the end is all that ties your tires to you car.

Ford Style closer view

Chevy C-Clip style closer view

Gallery

Wednesday, March 2nd, 2005

I spent some time today and put together a much better site galley. I have it linked to my iPhoto so I will be able to export some of the nearly 8,000 photos that I have snapped over the last 2 years, many of which are Hot Rod related. To check it out follow the link in the menu to the right, or click here. So far I have some Power Tour Photos and some photos I have taken driving around town.